Skip to content

A examination of Trump's first 100 days: Skillful negotiation or simply disorder?

Unpredictable tariffs imposed by Trump have aggravated inflation, discouraged economic investments, triggered a $7 trillion slide in the U.S. stock market, and nearly brought bond markets to a standstill.

A examination of Trump's first 100 days: Skillful negotiation or simply disorder?

During the initial 100 days of President Donald Trump's tenure, his tariff policies left a significant impact on export-oriented economies, such as Mexico and South Korea, though the consequences differed due to negotiations and sector-specific exemptions:

MexicoInitially, the threat of a 25% tariff on imports loomed starting February 4. However, discussions led to numerous suspensions and concessions. Following an agreement to station more border security personnel, Trump dropped his tariff threat on March 6, postponing them for a month. Automotive imports, as long as they adhered to USMCA rules, received a one-month exemption, easing the burden on automakers like Ford and GM. Yet, uncertainty lingered as the potential for renewed tariffs and expanded product coverage under Section 232 investigations (for instance, medium-to-heavy trucks) cast a shadow over exporters.

South KoreaTrump's executive order from February 1 established 25% tariffs across unspecified sectors, including a 24% tariff on Japan and a 32% tariff on Taiwan. Unfortunately, specific details for South Korea beyond this initial rate were scarce in available data. In parallel, the U.S. initiated Section 232 investigations into critical imports like semiconductors, heavy trucks, intensifying risks for Korean exporters if future tariffs expanded.

Comparisons- Automotive Sector: Mexico gained temporary breathing room via USMCA compliance[1], while South Korea (a major auto exporter) potentially faced exposure through unspecified tariffs and downstream product investigations[2][3].- Retaliation: In contrast to China's prompt 15% counter-tariff on LNG[1], Mexico and South Korea refrained from extensive retaliation, underscoring their dependence on U.S. market access.- Negotiation Dynamics: Mexico utilized border security cooperation to push back tariffs[1], whereas South Korea's position in the timeline remained less apparent in available records[3].

These measures forced export-dependent economies to acquiesce to the U.S.'s demands while revealing vulnerabilities in sectors such as manufacturing and energy[1][2].

  1. The international industry of automobiles noticed a significant shift during President Donald Trump's tenure due to his tariff policies, as exporters in Mexico found temporary relief with USMCA compliance, while South Korea, another major player, faced potential exposure from unspecified tariffs.
  2. The arts community took notice of Trump's impact on policy-and-legislation, particularly in the realm of defense and technology, as his tariffs resulted in increased risks for Korean exporters of semiconductors and heavy trucks.
  3. In the arena of general news, it was observed that nations like Mexico and South Korea, particularly those with an export-oriented economy, were flocking to Trump's administration for negotiations to secure sector-specific exemptions.
  4. The economy of Seoul, similarly to Mexico City, experienced repercussions from Trump’s tariffs, with the threat of a 25% tariff placing pressure on their PCBs exports, a key industry for both nations.
  5. Politics played a significant role during Trump's tenure, as his tariff policies caused uncertainty not only in countries like South Korea but also in the international industry as a whole, leading to a potential shift in the balance of power between countries.
  6. In the realm of business, it became evident that Trump's tariff policies had varying impacts on different sectors, from the automotive industry to semiconductors and heavy trucks, creating an environment of instability and forcing many exporters to adapt quickly.
  7. Despite the tension created by Trump's tariff policies, particularly in the defense and technology sectors, there were no overt acts of retaliation from nations in the international industry, signifying a need for continued diplomacy and cooperation in the years to come.
Trump's tariffs have been detrimental, escalating inflation, restraining economic investment, causing a $7 trillion U.S. stock market plunge, and potentially immobilizing the bond markets. The inconsistency and instability of this policy have been worrying factors.
Trump's tariffs have exacerbated inflation, besides that, the erratic and unforeseeable nature of the policy has deterred economic investment, led to a $7 trillion retreat in the U.S. stock market, and brought the bond markets close to collapse.
Unpredictable tariffs imposed by Trump have exacerbated inflation, deterred economic investments, instigated a $7 trillion retreat in the U.S. stock market, and almost paralyzed the bond markets.

Read also:

Latest