2024 Election Contestation Progresses: Kamala Harris Fails to Gather Votes in a Specific New York County
Title: Questionable Vote Counts in the Rockland County Elections of 2024
The concrete evidence of reckoning for the 2024 election results, specifically in Rockland County, New York, has been shoved into the spotlight following a lawsuit. Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court has ordered a full, thorough recount of the ballots cast in Rockland County due to suspicious inconsistencies revealed during the discovery process.
The lead plaintiff in this case is SMART Legislation, working under the umbrella of SMART Elections, a non-partisan group advocating for election security and voting rights. Lulu Friesdat, the group's founder and executive director, shared her concerns in a statement, stating that there are indications pointing towards inaccurate Senate results and doubts about the presidential election outcomes due to statistical improbabilities.
"Being absolutely certain about the election results, especially in today's fraught environment, is of utmost importance," Friesdat emphasized. With the constitutional rights of voters at stake, SMART Legislation believes conducting a full, public, and transparent hand recount of all presidential and Senate ballots would guarantee the integrity of the election.
The lawsuit stems from alarming discrepancies that have surfaced during vote tabulations. For instance, an independent U.S. Senate candidate allegedly received no votes, despite multiple voters swearing they had voted for her. In some districts, even when voters opted for Democratic State Senate candidate Kirsten Gillibrand, no votes were recorded for Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate, which is statistically suspicious.
Moreover,University of Alabama physics and astronomy professor Max Bonamente executed a data analysis that found statistically improbable vote patterns in four out of five Rockland County towns when contrasted with the 2020 election results.
As the court case progresses, concerns about the reliability of the ES&S voting machines and Pro V&V lab's approval of last-minute software changes prior to the election have heightened scrutiny. Public and expert voices are demanding a thorough audit to maintain confidence in the electoral process.
While these concerns might not be comprehensive enough to overturn the overall certified election results in New York, their seriousness warrants thorough investigation to ensure election integrity. The court case advances with an upcoming hearing scheduled for September 22, demonstrating the judicial commitment to addressing these concerns and instituting clarity[1].
[1] Further context reveals that while legal experts may claim the discrepancies are not sufficient to outright reverse the overall certified election results in New York, the seriousness of the accurate count of ballots cast in Rockland County underscores the importance of election transparency and integrity.
- Given the concerns raised by SMART Legislation over questionable vote counts in the Rockland County Elections of 2024, such as the statistical improbabilities and discrepancies found during vote tabulations, politics and general news are abuzz with discussions about policy-and-legislation surrounding election security and the need for transparency.
- As war-and-conflicts often fuel political instability, the uncertain election outcomes in Rockland County, New York, could potentially ripple into broader national discussions, with the integrity of the electoral process being a key concern for all involved in the politics and policy-making processes.
